“I already know how to handle objections.”
Where discovery failedProbably. Most people who say that do — sitting down, with time to think, in a conversation that isn’t happening.
The question is whether you can run it cold, on the phone, at 4:55 on a Friday, when they say it slightly differently than you rehearsed. Knowing an objection and running one are different skills. One is memory. The other is reps.
“I don’t have time for this.”
Put a number on waitingA rep takes four minutes. You spent longer than that on the last call you lost — and longer again explaining to yourself why you lost it.
So it isn’t a time problem. It’s a priority problem, and I’d rather say that than sell you a shortcut that doesn’t exist.
“Isn’t this just ChatGPT with a prompt?”
What earns beliefUnderneath, it’s Claude. I’m not going to pretend otherwise.
The difference is that this prospect doesn’t want to help you. It carries a hidden conviction score from 0 to 10, starts low, and only moves when you genuinely earn it — and it goes colder when you discount or stall. Ask a chatbot to play a hard buyer and it caves in two turns, because it’s built to be agreeable. This one is built to hold. It draws on 91 objections taken off recorded calls, not invented ones.
“$49 a month is steep.”
Why defending the price losesCompared to what? Not to another subscription — to a commission.
I’m not going to insult you by calling that a hard decision. The real risk isn’t the price — it’s that it doesn’t move your close rate at all. Which is why the first hundred credits are free and there’s no card: you’ll know inside one rep.
“Let me think about it.”
What it actually meansThat one kills more deals than price, and it’s almost never true.
What it usually means is there’s a question you haven’t asked yet. So ask it — [email protected], and I answer those myself. Or don’t, and take one rep instead: nothing to install, no card, four minutes.